Major Summit Could Put World's Poorest Inhabitants on Corporate Chopping Block

The ministerial meetings for the WTO must deliver on food security and development for the world's poor.

By Deborah James/AlterNet

Last week, 453 civil society groups including trade unions, farmers, environmentalists, public interest groups and development advocates from over 150 countries wrote an urgent letter to members of the WTO to “express extreme alarm about the current situation of the negotiations in the WTO.” This is the largest number of endorsers on a letter about the WTO in the last decade and is a signal of the dire situation. Coordinated by the global Our World Is Not for Sale (OWINFS) network, the letter is available in English, Spanish and French.

 The 10th Ministerial meeting of the WTO, taking place in Nairobi, Kenya from December 15-18, is occurring against a backdrop of accelerated “mega-regional” comprehensive pro-corporate “trade” deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). At the same time, mostly rich countries are also expanding the corporate liberalization model in certain sectors like services (through the proposed Trade in Services Agreement or TiSA), and on goods (through the proposed Information Technology Agreement, or ITA and the Environmental Goods Agreement or EGA).

 The WTO meeting is also occurring immediately after a global deal on climate was struck in Paris, which many call a step in the right direction but also acknowledge that it is not nearly ambitious enough to resolve the global climate crisis.

 A bit of background: when the Doha Round was launched in 2001, developing countries only agreed to the new round on the basis that it would address the problems of the bad deal that created the existing WTO. Thus the negotiation mandate focused on development, including specific changes proposed to the WTO in what’s called the “Special and Differential Treatment (SDT)” agenda. Most of these proposed changes would give developing countries more flexibility from WTO rules, thus reducing the intrusion of the WTO into their domestic sphere, to enable them to enact development policies in line with their national interests.

 Major emphasis was also placed on agriculture, on reducing the subsidies and tariffs used by rich countries, which harm developing country farm production and food security. Poor countries have been fighting to be able to protect their farmers’ livelihoods, food security and rural development from surges in imports of subsidized products, through what’s called the Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM). This is because rich countries have still refused to limit either their domestic (point of production) subsidies or the advantages they provide to agribusinesses at the point of export. Developing countries are also fighting to be permitted by WTO rules to invest in their own agricultural production and strengthen domestic food security programs that are currently permitted for rich but not developing countries, not even for Least Developed Countries (LDCs)!

 Unfortunately, it seems that developed countries never intended to deliver on those development and agricultural reform promises, and have spent the last 14 years of the Doha Round sidelining development issues and instead working to expand the WTO’s neoliberal dictates on services, goods, agriculture and other issues. At the same time, they have taken their corporate wish lists to other forums, concluding the TPP and negotiating the TTIP, TiSA, ITA and EGA mentioned above.

 These developments have drastically reduced the leverage developing countries have in the WTO to achieve their developmental agendas. In effect, because rich countries have never agreed to any proposals by developing countries or LDCs, and are now focused on attaining their interests elsewhere, they are now attempting to formally abandon any “development” mandate in the WTO.

 This effort, which is the main fight in Nairobi, is even more pernicious because their goal is two-fold: abandon the development mandate, and then open up space to introduce all the new corporate issues they have been negotiating in the TPP, TTIP and other deals into the WTO, including investment, government procurement, disciplining state owned enterprises, and others. Many of these issues are not permitted to be on the agenda in the WTO while Doha is still being negotiated.

 After 20 years of the WTO’s corporate model, and the massive displacement of farmers, increased inequality, financial crises and massive climate crises, civil society is clear: the current WTO cannot be allowed to continue in terms of business as usual. There are immediate changes that must be made to the worst aspects of the current WTO. These should be the urgent priority, as a first step towards the transformation of the global trade system towards one that works for sustainable development, jobs, and food sovereignty. Simultaneously, the WTO must not be allowed to expand the scope and breadth of its privatization and deregulation agenda through “new issues.”

 In their letter, civil society highlighted that success in Nairobi must mean “[f]ulfilling the development mandate by strengthening SDT for all developing countries, removing WTO obstacles to food security, and operationalizing benefits for the [LDCs].” They specified that the WTO Ministerial will be a failure from a development perspective, unless the agriculture rules are changed in four ways. Poor countries must be allowed to invest in food security through public stockholding programs; rich countries’ domestic supports and export competition policies that hurt poor country markets must be reined in; poor countries must be allowed to protect their farmers from subsidized imports; and cotton subsidies must be slashed, along with other concerns of the Least Developed Countries.

 They also highlighted what agenda items must not be incorporated, noting that “introducing a corporate wish list of ‘new issues’ must be off the table at Nairobi,” and that the “WTO Ministerial will be a failure from a development perspective if ‘new issues’ – including under the sneaky rubric of ‘discussions on global value chains (GVCs) or the digital economy’ – are agreed to in Nairobi as part of the post-Ministerial agenda.”

 They concluded that: “[f]or the Ministerial to ‘work’ for food, jobs, and sustainable development, the necessary outcome is clear: the transformation of the gross inequities in the global agricultural system must begin, including: removing WTO obstacles to public stockholding for food security; a concrete and workable SSM; and disciplining domestic supports and export competition. Across the WTO, development demands must be met, including the full scope of the G90 proposals for all developing countries, and the operationalizing of the LDC package. The corporate and rich country government agenda of permanently abandoning the development mandate must be forestalled, along with the imposition of a set of already-rejected or ill-defined non-trade ‘new issues’.”

 The letter echoes many concerns raised by civil society throughout the history of the WTO, including a letter sent by 345 organizations in July, as well as the OWINFS Turnaround Statement that includes an extensive list of transformative policy changes, and the original Shrink or Sink! manifesto on the Doha Round.

 The whole world watched as representatives of nearly every country on the global negotiated a landmark climate deal in Paris last week. Experts have detailed how governments won’t be able to implement many aspects of the deal, however, if agreements like the TPP, TTIP [PDF] or TiSA come into force. Much the same could be said about the WTO. Developing country unity and North-South peoples’ solidarity will be essential to a positive outcome at the WTO. Let’s make sure that the United States, the EU, Japan, Australia and others realize that the imperative of development and public interests must come before corporate profit. A good deal should be struck in Nairobi. But if not, then no deal is better than a bad deal.

Deborah James, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., facilitates the campaign on the WTO for the Our World Is Not for Sale (OWINFS) network. OWINFS is a global network of NGOs and social movements working for a sustainable, socially just, and democratic multilateral trading system. www.ourworldisnotforsale.org.

http://www.alternet.org/world/major-summit-could-put-worlds-poorest-inhabitants-corporate-chopping-block

392 comments

  • Michaelkam

    Michaelkam

    Comment Link Monday, 02 April 2018 01:51

    best site buy cialis
    cheap cialis
    buy cialis uk next day delivery
    cialis online
    order cialis online safe
    cialis pills
    cialis buy london
    cialis pills
    generic cialis cheap online

  • auto insurance quotes

    auto insurance quotes

    Comment Link Saturday, 31 March 2018 10:02

    cheap car insurance companies
    cheap car insurance quotes comparison
    auto insurance companies
    cheap car insurance companies

  • cheap car insurance coverage

    cheap car insurance coverage

    Comment Link Saturday, 31 March 2018 01:09

    auto insurance program
    cheap car insurance quotes comparison
    auto insurance quotes comparison online
    car insurance quotes usaa

  • car insurance quotes in florida

    car insurance quotes in florida

    Comment Link Saturday, 31 March 2018 00:25

    cheap auto insurance quotes
    car insurance quotes in florida
    cheap auto insurance quotes
    cheap car insurance companies

  • BrettHof

    BrettHof

    Comment Link Friday, 30 March 2018 23:47

    is viagra generic now
    ed pills
    existe el cialis generico
    erectile dysfunction pills
    can you take more than 100 mg of viagra
    erection pills
    viagra pills in new zealand
    erection pills
    cheap levitra uk

  • Timothysiz

    Timothysiz

    Comment Link Friday, 30 March 2018 22:32

    buy viagra in sri lanka
    ed pills that work
    viagra professional 100mg
    ed pills that work
    donde puedo comprar viagra sin receta medica
    ed pills that work
    can you buy viagra tesco
    erectile dysfunction remedies
    precio de viagra 50 mg

  • Arthurfreek

    Arthurfreek

    Comment Link Friday, 30 March 2018 01:38

    cialis 20mg x viagra 50mg
    generic viagra
    efectos viagra 100mg
    generic viagra online
    omg viagra
    viagra online sales
    viagra full price
    viagra sale
    cialis viagra levitra price comparison

  • casino online subtitrat

    casino online subtitrat

    Comment Link Thursday, 29 March 2018 18:01

    casino games roulette
    online casino slots
    online casino
    best online casino games free

  • casino online subtitrat

    casino online subtitrat

    Comment Link Monday, 26 March 2018 19:13

    new usa online casinos
    play casinos
    top rated free online casino games
    casino online subtitrat

  • generic viagra

    generic viagra

    Comment Link Monday, 26 March 2018 19:08

    cheap viagra without prescriptions
    generic viagra
    viagra sale scams

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

back to top