Agenda to Bring New Corporate Issues into the WTO is Defeated, But So Are Developing Countries' Demands for More Policy Space for Development

Nairobi, Kenya - At the first ministerial meeting of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Africa, it was clear that the majority of members opposed further WTO expansion, and fortunately the effort by some developed countries to impose new pro-corporate issues on the agenda was defeated. However, the 162 WTO members also failed to affirm the importance and focus of having a true "development round," a promise made in 2001 in Doha and the core mandate of the Doha Round.

However, rich countries have never agreed to any of the development-centered proposals in the 14 years of the Round, which remains unconcluded. The blame for this lies with those who rejected the development proposals, rather than with the aspiration that privileges development needs over just expanding trade.

The majority of members demanded changes to existing WTO rules that constrain development, and in particular to the unfair agricultural rules that limit support for small farmers and food security in Africa and Asia. Unfortunately, the U.S. and other rich countries blocked progress on these life or death issues for some of the most vulnerable countries in Nairobi, as they have at every other ministerial meeting.

African members and other Least Developed Countries (LDCs) were excluded from the real negotiations, and the principal imperative to affirm the development mandate was blocked by only a few members. This revealed once again how the WTO model of global trade rules is inadequate to address the real economic crises of our times.

Negotiators must now return to Geneva and redouble their urgent efforts to change WTO rules that constrain the ability of countries to achieve food security through supporting domestic agricultural production, as demanded by the recently approved Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of reducing poverty and eradicating hunger.

Since the WTO's founding in 1995, most developing countries have realized that the institution was set up to favor the transnational corporate interests of developed countries, rather than to promote development-centered policy. Over the last 20 years, developing countries have suffered under a WTO system that constrains them from using policies that developed countries successfully implemented for their development. Poorer nations have thus long advanced proposals for more flexibility in the global rules to allow for national policies that promote food security, jobs, and sustainable development.

Two-thirds of WTO members made concrete proposals to allow them the flexibility to pursue such policies, including promoting infant industries to create jobs and foster small businesses, in order to reduce unemployment and poverty. Grouped together under the umbrella of "Special and Differential Treatment," these proposals were strenuously opposed by the United States, and ended up being simply ignored in Nairobi.

At the same time, developing countries have long demanded changes to international rules on agricultural trade. Wealthy countries are still allowed to provide tens of billions of dollars in trade-distorting subsidies to agribusiness exporters at the expense of small farmers around the world. Yet developing countries are only allowed to provide minimal supports to their farmers.

The SDGs affirm the need for developing countries to invest in small farmers and promote local, resilient agricultural production in order to improve rural livelihoods and provide domestic food security. This is an urgent global priority because 20,000 people die every day from hunger and poverty-related diseases. But poor countries will not be able to address this food security crisis and significantly reduce hunger if WTO rules restricting needed domestic investments are not changed. Last year, WTO members failed to reach agreement to change these restrictions, as the U.S., along with the EU, Japan, and Australia opposed it, leaving an unsatisfactory interim band-aid in place.

Meanwhile, developing countries face surges of imported, often subsidized agricultural products, which have devastating effects on local food production. Developing countries have sought to protect their domestic producers from subsidized imports, by using the same policies available to rich countries to do the same. Unfortunately, these rich countries were only willing to consider discussing such protections if developing countries first opened their markets to more imports, which would negate the point of the protections the poorer countries need for their sensitive markets.

WTO members were able to agree on some disciplines on the advantages that developed countries provided to their agricultural exporters. But these "export competition" policies are not the source of most trade-distorting subsidies. It is the subsidies and other advantages labeled under "domestic supports" that cause the most damage to developing-country farmers, and they continue unabated.

The LDCs in the WTO also sought more flexibility in the rules so that they might participate more in the global economy and use trade for development. Yet again, the U.S. and other developed countries gave little heed to their demands, agreeing on only a few provisions of tiny economic significance.

U.S. efforts in the Nairobi Ministerial focused on bringing a new corporate wish list of issues into the WTO, including issues previously rejected by developing countries (in the 2003 ministerial), regarding investment, competition policy, and government procurement, as well as issues from other agreements, such as cross-border data transfers. India and African and other developing countries were successful in blocking the introduction of a mandate for these issues, although the U.S. is working overtime to convince the public and media that the door for these issues was actually opened.

The U.S. and the EU will continue to push regional comprehensive deals such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), along with agreements on specific issues such as the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA). But far from being consigned to the margins of global trade, the hard fight put forth by rich countries in Nairobi demonstrates the seriousness with which they take the WTO as a forum for multilateral rulemaking.

The global civil society network that opposes WTO expansion, the Our World Is Not For Sale (OWINFS) network, also advocates for a multilateral trading system, and OWINFS members from 25 countries organized in Nairobi for a more positive outcome. Our vision, however, is for a multilateral system that is sustainable, socially just, democratic and accountable; the current WTO is a long way from that.

Those who desire economic justice must advocate for immediate changes to the WTO, to relieve the suffering of the poorest and most marginalized peoples. At the same time, we must advocate for a transformation of the global trade system to one that promotes food security, jobs, and sustainable development. Given the way things are currently going at the WTO, it will be a long struggle indeed.

Deborah James facilitates the global campaign against WTO expansion for the global OWINFS network, and is the Director of International Programs for the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC.

  • Rate this item
    (0 votes)
  • Published in Opinions
  • Read 6151 times


  • JamesFlami


    Comment Link Saturday, 18 November 2017 03:05

    free sex video chat free adult webcam chat web cam sex chat free adult webcam chat direct payday loan lenders payday cash advance loan direct payday loan lenders payday loans direct lenders easy fast payday loans speedycash easy payday loans easy fast payday loans buy a research paper online buy essay buy an essay buy an essay lesbian show lesbian show asian sex show adult cam

  • IgorTot


    Comment Link Saturday, 18 November 2017 01:22

    best way to take cialis black

    cialis online

    buy cialis

    cialis buy cheap md tabs

  • Ace Homework

    Ace Homework

    Comment Link Friday, 17 November 2017 22:51

    buy essay without plagiarism buy essay buy essays online buy an essay online

  • WalterTof


    Comment Link Friday, 17 November 2017 20:57

    generic cialis mail order
    cialis without a doctor
    cialis for sale online
    cialis without a doctor
    cheap cialis online australia

  • JamesFlami


    Comment Link Friday, 17 November 2017 18:00

    payday advance loan instant online loans easy payday loans direct lenders no credit check best online payday loans direct payday lenders bad credit same day payday loans online best payday loans online easy approval payday loans easy approval payday loans same day loan cash advance lenders girl webcam web cams porn free live sex chat chat rooms custom essay essay checker dissertation help in uk essay writer payday loans online direct lenders payday loans online direct lenders payday loans online direct lenders payday loans online direct lender

  • JamesFlami


    Comment Link Friday, 17 November 2017 17:15

    online slave training lesbian show lesbian show lesbian show college essay prompts college essay writer essay helper who to write a research paper direct payday lenders online payday loans direct lenders direct payday lenders online payday bad credit loan chem homework help buy essay online best homework help sites buy an essay write my paper research essay research report hire someone to do your homework write my paper for me how to write a term paper write my paper for me doctoral dissertation help

  • JoeFlami


    Comment Link Friday, 17 November 2017 17:01

    essay writing service review essays writing services click for source admission essay writing service

  • Fake Essay Writer

    Fake Essay Writer

    Comment Link Friday, 17 November 2017 16:47

    buy essays online buy essay online buy an essay online buy essay without getting caught

  • JamesFlami


    Comment Link Friday, 17 November 2017 15:00

    direct lenders online loans online loans direct lenders loans online direct lenders payday loans payday loan lenders paydayloans online online payday loan lenders internet payday loans homework help live chat college essay writer buy an essay essay writing assignment help lesbian show show girls lesbian show porn show corporate finance homework help buy an essay buy essay buy essay online essay application essay essay writer essay writer bad credit loans direct lenders easy payday loans direct loan lenders easy approval payday loans

  • EVrcercync


    Comment Link Friday, 17 November 2017 14:42

    female viagra does it work
    viagra canada no prescription
    buy viagra
    cheap viagra canada
    buy generic viagra

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

back to top