NAIROBI – South African Trade Minister Rob Davies on Thursday (Dec. 17) acknowledged that the Doha round is not likely to be reaffirmed in a ministerial declaration here due to conflicting views among World Trade Organization members, but made clear that the differences must be expressed in a way that is not interpreted as burying the Doha mandate.
In an interview with , Davies said there is a danger that including language in the declaration stating that there is a divide between members on whether to reaffirm the Doha mandate could be interpreted by some as legally ending the round if even there is no political declaration to do so.
“That may not be political, but we'd have to make sure that doesn't legally bury [the round] as well,” he said. “And we'd have to see what the formulations that have been proposed are. ... We haven't seen the text yet as we've seen on agriculture.”
The U.S. has made clear that it would consider the lack of consensus on reaffirming the Doha round apparent here as meaning the round is over. Asked about the U.S. position, Davies said that was exactly his point. “We won't be part of anything that records something that is then interpreted as meaning it's ended,” he added.
Davies said he planned to deliver a similar message to U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman during a bilateral meeting later in the day Thursday.
When pressed why language reflecting the lack of consensus on continuing Doha would legally kill the round, Davies did not provide a clear answer. “All of those issues and questions … require us to be sure of the legal interpretation of what's written as well as the political interpretation,” he said.
Davies identified the post-Nairobi work program and how to deal with the Doha Round as the “biggest issue” at this ministerial, overshadowing what he described as a “modest” package of agreements on agriculture. He said a potential ministerial declaration would not likely define the future work program in any detail, leaving the conversation to continue after the meeting.
As of midday Thursday, on how the Doha round should be addressed in the ministerial declaration, but were slated to do so Thursday evening. A senior Swiss official told that this is because ministers have focused on the agriculture talks and cannot tackle both issues at the same time.
The lack of progress on the Doha issue was evident in a revised draft ministerial declaration circulated to WTO members here Thursday morning. The document, dated Dec. 16, shows no reduction in the number of brackets that address the future of the Doha round.
In the interview, Davies argued that the Doha round architecture needs to be preserved because it prioritizes the issues of development and agricultural trade reform and enshrines key concepts such as “special and differential treatment” and “less than full reciprocity.”
Asked why it was not acceptable to merely state that these issues remain priorities in the WTO's future work without reaffirming the Doha round, Davies indicated that the Doha architecture provides developing countries with greater assurances that these issues will be addressed, how they will be addressed, and that they will not fall off the agenda as other WTO members try to add new issues.
“I think that for us the preservation of the Doha mandate is important because it does shape the work program and shape a set of principles, and if we just allow that to be buried here in Nairobi, either politically or legally … then we will be back to square one, and we will not know the framework within which those issues are going to be addressed, the way they're going to be addressed or anything like that, and in practice we could find that there will be demands for a whole series of other issues, which would marginalize those issues,” he said.
U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman has made the opposite argument, claiming that dropping the Doha round architecture would free up WTO members to tackle the Doha issues with fresh approaches and discuss new issues such as e-commerce and the role of small businesses in trade. He reiterated that view in a plenary speech to his fellow ministers on Thursday.
"Freeing ourselves from the strictures of the Doha framework would allow us bring new, creative approaches to those issues, as well as allow us to explore emerging trade issues, revitalizing the WTO and the multilateral trading system," Froman said.
Asked to respond to the U.S. talking point that the Doha round should be ended because it has not delivered results in 14 years, Davies implicitly blamed developed countries for the deadlock. He said that what was on the table on agriculture in Doha incorporated the sensitivities and realities of countries that benefited from the existing agriculture trade regime, but similar flexibilities were not provided on issues like industrial tariffs that are sensitive for developing countries.
The U.S., by contrast, blames the Doha deadlock on advanced developing countries like China, India, Brazil and South Africa, which it views as being unwilling to make concessions in at the WTO commensurate with their weight in the global economy. This is particularly true in the areas of domestic agricultural subsidies, which the U.S. says China is unwilling to limit even though it has now become a major subsidizer.
Some in the U.S. believe that it may take a failure in Nairobi to convince developing countries that multilateral trade negotiations cannot succeed if they do not make bigger concessions.
Latest from SEATINI Kenya
- Latest EGA Negotiations To Focus On Final List, Phase outs, 'Critical Mass'
- Some ICs plan "modern trade deals" at WTO Published in SUNS #8210 dated 30 March 2016
- 54th Session of the Commission for Social Development
- China, Japan Vie For Permanent Appellate Body Seat At WTO
- Nairobi Rules On Article 9.4 Subsidies, Export Credits May Be Enforceable
Comment Link Thursday, 30 November 2017 01:22
Spot on with this write-up, I honestly believe that this website needs far more attention. I'll probably be back again to read through more, thanks for the advice!
Comment Link Wednesday, 29 November 2017 15:08
I wanted to thank you for this good read!! I absolutely loved every bit of it.
I have got you saved as a favorite to look at new stuff you post…
Comment Link Sunday, 26 November 2017 04:42
It's very easy to find out any matter on net as compared to textbooks, as I found this article at this site.
Comment Link Sunday, 26 November 2017 02:42
I like the valuable info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and
check again here frequently. I am quite certain I will learn lots of new stuff right here!
Good luck for the next!
Comment Link Friday, 24 November 2017 16:04
Useful information. Lucky me I found your site accidentally, and I am stunned why this accident did not took
place in advance! I bookmarked it.
Comment Link Wednesday, 22 November 2017 03:57
Howdy this is somewhat of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or
if you have to manually code with HTML. I'm starting a blog
soon but have no coding skills so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Comment Link Tuesday, 21 November 2017 09:57
great issues altogether, you simply gained a brand new reader.
What may you recommend in regards to your
publish that you simply made a few days ago? Any positive?
Comment Link Monday, 13 November 2017 20:36
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I really appreciate your efforts and
I am waiting for your next post thank you once again.
Comment Link Monday, 13 November 2017 14:19
When some one searches for his vital thing,
thus he/she wants to be available that in detail, therefore that thing is maintained over here.
Comment Link Sunday, 12 November 2017 11:43
I every time emailed this blog post page to all
my contacts, because if like to read it after that my
contacts will too.