What we can learn from U.S. efforts to apply the coup de grace to multilateral trade negotiations.
Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a regular contributor to PostEverything.
One of the truisms of the postwar multilateral trade negotiations is that each “round” of trade talks has been longer than the previous one. The Uruguay round, which led to the creation of the World Trade Organization, lasted eight years. The current Doha round began in November 2001. The last serious effort to complete the round collapsed in the summer of 2008; the negotiations are now on year 14 with no end in sight.
The Doha round become something of a punching bag for those who like to slag on global governance. I wrote a book about post-2008 global governance called “The System Worked,” and even I had some fun at the Doha round’s expense.
I bring this all up because U.S. Trade Representative Mike Froman dropped a bomb in Monday’s Financial Times, just before the next WTO Ministerial meeting in Nairobi. Froman’s op-ed contains a rather serious proposal with respect to Doha: kill it. Kill it with fire:
This week trade ministers from around the world will gather to engage once again in the Doha Round of talks which, for all the initial hopes it represented, simply has not delivered. If global trade is to drive development and prosperity as strongly this century as it did in the last, we need to write a new chapter for the World Trade Organisation that reflects today’s economic realities. It is time for the world to free itself of the strictures of Doha….
So, two-way deals are working. Regional pacts are working. Groups of countries have struck sectoral deals. Only multilateralism — the attempt to reach a comprehensive global deal — is stuck. Getting it unstuck begins with acknowledging that Doha was designed in a different era, for a different era, and much has changed since.
To be clear, Froman is not calling for the shelving of the WTO (indeed, one of the biggest misperceptions of the World Trade Organization is that it’s just about the trade rounds) but rather, a different way of negotiating within the WTO. In plain language, Froman wants an approach that does not require consensus on everything before anything can be accomplished.
Shawn Donnan reports in the FT that the global reactions to Froman’s announcement will be somewhat variegated:
Countries such as Brazil, China and India and many of the WTO’s African members insist the [Doha] round needs to continue, because the Doha Development Agenda, as it is formally known, includes issues of vital importance to poorer countries, such as efforts to rein in agricultural subsidies in rich economies like the US and EU….
In the lead up to this week’s gathering, other big advanced economies such the EU and Japan have sided with the US in its push for a new approach to negotiations after the Nairobi meeting and a shift to more focused discussions on specific sectors rather than a monolithic global agreement.
Although those advanced economies and other supporters such as Australia and New Zealand, represent a majority of the global economy and world trade, they remain a minority in the 160-member WTO, in which decisions are made by consensus.
So we can learn a few things from this announcement and its reaction.
The first is that the United States really likes the Bretton Woods institutions… until the transaction costs of negotiating within them get too high. Which is just a wee bit hypocritical. After all, the United States has frowned on China setting up financial institutions outside the IMF’s purview. This op-ed is the U.S.’s way of saying that Washington is perfectly fine pursuing this approach on the trade front, because it can’t get what it wants through the multilateral trade round.
The second thing is that the developed economies’ support for the U.S. position suggests that key players in the developing world have overplayed their hand. Five or 10 years ago, there is no way the United States makes this announcement without catching all kinds of hell. At year 14, however, it seems that everyone is tired of trying to negotiate trade deals with recalcitrant WTO members. To be clear, there should be a bargain that can be completed. The fact that it’s come to this is a partial indictment of the developed economies for not giving more on agricultural subsidies — but it’s also an indictment of developing country trade negotiators showing little recognition of what is politically feasible.
The third thing is that the USTR is taking a big risk here. The U.S. logic is that with the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP) in the works, the United States can just walk away from Doha. Except that there’s no guarantee that Congress will ratify the TPP, and no guarantee that the T-TIP negotiations will even be completed anytime soon. Or, to put it in tweet form:
Froman’s op-ed is the next logical move in the forum-shopping game of trade negotiations. That doesn’t mean it isn’t risky.
Latest from SEATINI Kenya
- Latest EGA Negotiations To Focus On Final List, Phase outs, 'Critical Mass'
- Some ICs plan "modern trade deals" at WTO Published in SUNS #8210 dated 30 March 2016
- 54th Session of the Commission for Social Development
- China, Japan Vie For Permanent Appellate Body Seat At WTO
- Nairobi Rules On Article 9.4 Subsidies, Export Credits May Be Enforceable
JamesfrickComment Link Monday, 02 April 2018 23:12
viagra pills yahoo answers
much do viagra pills cost
generic viagra online without script
can you buy viagra online safely
viagra for sale uk only
pillola viagra per donna
viagra for sale uk only
total sales viagra
ArthurgeTComment Link Monday, 02 April 2018 18:52
buying viagra over the counter in the uk
viagra pills 100 mg
buy viagra from canada
generic levitra cialis viagra
viagra for sale uk
get off viagra
viagra online sales
the hard sell the life of a viagra salesman
MyronavaizComment Link Monday, 02 April 2018 14:31
http://canadapharmacyonlinex.com canada online pharmacy levitra adderall canada pharmacy online online pharmacy canada retin a canada online pharmacy levitra
MichaelkamComment Link Monday, 02 April 2018 02:53
where can i get cheap cialis
buy cialis online for cheap
cheapest generic viagra and cialis
cialis for sale australia
generic cialis on sale
AlvinkahComment Link Sunday, 01 April 2018 15:43
pills that look like cialis
cialis cheap overnight
is it safe to order cialis online
buy cialis online
is cheap cialis safe
JerrodzenComment Link Sunday, 01 April 2018 12:00
cheap cialis in nz
generic cialis online without script
cialis buy online canada
buy generic cialis
buy cialis without prescriptions
buy cialis online
buy cialis bangkok
buy cialis online
cialis soft pills
EldonabsemComment Link Sunday, 01 April 2018 05:18
cheapest place to buy generic cialis
where to buy cialis online
buy generic viagra cialis
can i buy cialis in dubai
buy cialis in the usa
RichardironiComment Link Sunday, 01 April 2018 04:46
real cialis for sale
cialis at discount price
best website to order cialis
order cialis online mastercard
cheap cialis melbourne
Comment Link Saturday, 31 March 2018 12:35
cheap car insurance
car insurance quotes in florida
auto insurance quotes online
Comment Link Saturday, 31 March 2018 12:28
car insurance quotes usaa
cheap car insurance calculator
cheap auto insurance
auto insurance program